Only 53 US Companies Have Been on the Fortune 500 since 1955, Thanks to the Creative Destruction That Fuels Economic Prosperity
This high turnover rate of Americas most successful businesses is a positive sign.
What do the companies in these three groups have in common?
Group A: American Motors, Brown Shoe, Studebaker, Collins Radio, Detroit Steel, Zenith Electronics and National Sugar Refining.
Group B: Boeing, Campbell Soup Company, Colgate-Palmolive, Deere & Company, General Motors, IBM, Kellogg Company, Procter and Gamble Company, and Whirlpool Corporation.
Group C:Amazon, Facebook, eBay, Home Depot, Microsoft, Google, Netflix, Office Depot and Target.
All of the companies inGroup Awere in the Fortune 500 in 1955, but not in 2018.
All of the companies inGroup Bwere in the Fortune 500 in both 1955 and 2018 (andhave remained on the list every year since it started in 1955).
All of the companies inGroup Cwere in the Fortune 500 in 2018, but not in 1955.
The list of Fortune 500 companies in 1955 is availablehereand for 2018here(based on sales for the fiscal year ended on or before Jan. 31, 2018). Comparing the 1955 Fortune 500 companies to the 2018 Fortune 500, there areonly 53 companies that appear in both lists and have remained on the list since it started(see graphic above). In other words, fewer than 11 percent of the Fortune 500 companies in 1955 have remained on the list during the 63 years since. More than 89 percent of the companies from 1955 have either gone bankrupt, merged with (or were acquired by) another firm, or they still exist but have fallen from the top Fortune 500 companies (ranked by total revenues) for one year or more.
For example, Ashland Global Holdings was in the Fortune 500 last year, but its sales have been flat and it dropped to No. 705 this yearthe cutoff to make the Fortune 500 this year was $5.4 billion in sales, and Ashlands sales were $3.2 billion. Many of the companies on the list in 1955 are unrecognizable, forgotten companies today (e.g., Armstrong Rubber, Cone Mills, Hines Lumber, Pacific Vegetable Oil, and Riegel Textile).
The constant turnover in the Fortune 500 is a positive sign of the dynamism and innovation that characterizes a vibrant consumer-oriented market economy.
The fact that nearly nine of every 10 Fortune 500 companies in 1955 are gone, merged, reorganized, or contracted demonstrates that theres been a lot of market disruption, churning, and Schumpeterian creative destruction over the last six decades. Its reasonable to assume that when the Fortune 500 list is released 60 years from now in 2078, almost all of todays Fortune 500 companies will no longer exist as currently configured, having been replaced by new companies in new, emerging industries, and for that we should be extremely thankful. The constant turnover in the Fortune 500 is a positive sign of the dynamism and innovation that characterizes a vibrant consumer-oriented market economy, and that dynamic turnover is speeding up in todays hyper-competitive global economy.
According to a 2016 report byInnosight(Corporate Longevity: Turbulence Ahead for Large Organizations), corporations in the S&P 500 Index in 1965 stayed in the index for an average of 33 years. By 1990, average tenure in the S&P 500 had narrowed to 20 years and is now forecast to shrink to 14 years by 2026. At the current churn rate, about half of todays S&P 500 firms will be replaced over the next 10 years as we enter a period of heightened volatility for leading companies across a range of industries, with the next ten years shaping up to bethe most potentially turbulent in modern history, according toInnosight.
We should appreciate the fact that we are the ultimate beneficiaries of the creative destruction that drives the dynamism of the market economy.
Another economic lesson to be learned from the creative destruction that results in the constant churning of Fortune 500 (and S&P 500) companies over time is that the process of market disruption is being driven by the endless pursuit of sales and profits that can only come from serving customers with low prices, high-quality products and services, and great customer service. If we think of a companys annual sales revenues as the number of dollar votes it gets every year from providing goods and services to consumers, we can then appreciate the fact that the Fortune 500 companies represent the 500 companies that have generated the greatest number dollar votes of confidence from us as consumerslike Walmart (No. 1 this year for the sixth straight year with more than $500 billion in dollar votes for 2018the first time the sales of any Fortune 500 company has exceeded the $500 billion mark), Exxon Mobil (No. 2 at $244 billion), Apple (No. 3 at $229 billion), CVS (No. 7 at $185 billion), Amazon (No. 8 at $178 billion), and General Motors (No. 10 at $157 billion).
As consumers, we should appreciate the fact that we are the ultimate beneficiaries of the Schumpeterian creative destruction that drives the dynamism of the market economy and results in a constant churning of the firms who are ultimately fighting to attract as many of our dollar votes as possible. The 500 top winners of that competitive battle in any given year are the firms in the Fortune 500, ranked not by their profits, assets or number of employees, but by what is ultimately most important in a market economy:their dollar votes (sales revenues).
Bonus Video(below), Introducing the 2018 Fortune 500.
span style=display: inline-block; width: 0 overflow: hidden; line-height: 0; data-mce-type=bookmark class=mce_SELRES_start data-mce-style=display: inline-block; width: 0 overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;/spanspan style=display: inline-block; width: 0 overflow: hidden; line-height: 0; data-mce-type=bookmark class=mce_SELRES_start data-mce-style=display: inline-block; width: 0 overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;/span
Reprinted from the American Enterprise Institute.
Mark J. Perry is a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and a professor of economics and finance at the University of Michigans Flint campus.
1 ? hide-related:
relArticle.author- relArticle.pub_date date : MMMM dd, yyyy
relArticle.author – relArticle.pub_date date : MMMM dd, yyyy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except for material where copyright is reserved by a party other than FEE.
Please do not edit the piece, ensure that you attribute the author and mention that this article was originally published on